原文作者Ebert團隊中的Sheila O'Malley。 Any detective interviewing a crowd of witnesses knows that every individual will have a different story about what they saw. Can there even be such a thing as "the truth" when it comes to complicated human interactions? This is the concept of "The Argument," directed by Robert Schwartzman, with screenplay by Zac Stanford. What would happen if a group of people attempted a re-enactment of something they all experienced together? Who said what when? Whose memory is the correct one? There are some very funny bits here, but unfortunately the concept takes too long getting off the ground, leaving the first three-quarters of the movie floating in limbo, waiting for it to all make sense. 【任何偵探如果盤問一組目擊者，可能都會發現每個人都會講一個不同的故事出來。當涉及到復雜的人際互動時，“真相”到底是否存在？這就是“The Argument”這部電影的基本概念，由羅伯特-史沃茲曼導演，Zac Stanford編劇。如果一群人試圖重建他們的共同經歷，會發生什么？誰在什么時候說了什么？誰的記憶是準確的？電影中有一些非常有趣的片段，但鋪墊概念用了太長時間，使電影前3/4的意義不明，等到最后才會發現其中的道理?！?Jack (Dan Fogler) is a struggling screenwriter, with just one credit to his name, a "cerebral" zombie movie called "The Dead Doth Trod the Hills at Night." He has a love-hate relationship with his girlfriend Lisa's burgeoning acting career. Lisa (Emma Bell) just got the role of Mozart's wife Constance in a production called "Wolfgang" and Jack is proud of her success, but jealous of her flirty connection with her co-star Paul (Tyler James Williams). Jack invites his literary agent Brett (Danny Pudi) and Brett's humorless wife Sarah (Maggie Q) over to celebrate the opening of "Wolfgang." It's already awkward because both Maggie and Brett obviously did not care for the show. What's even more awkward is Lisa, unbeknownst to Jack, invited Paul. Paul surprises Lisa by bringing along his giddily ditzy girlfriend Trina (Cleopatra Coleman). Lisa and Paul are hyped up on their success. Jack seethes. Maggie is bored. Brett is irritated. Trina gets wasted. Jack and Lisa are both so upset over how the night went, they invite everyone back the next night, to re-create things and see where it all went wrong. 【杰克是在職業生涯中掙扎的一名編劇，目前為止只有一部名為“The Dead Doth Trod the Hills at Night”的大腦僵尸電影；杰克與女友麗莎有著愛恨交織的一種關系；麗莎的演藝生涯剛剛起步，剛剛接下了名為“沃爾夫岡”的舞臺劇中莫扎特妻子Constance這一角色；杰克為麗莎驕傲，但對她和莫扎特男主演保羅之間的輕浮關系非常不滿?！蔽譅柗驅笆籽莸倪@晚，杰克請自己的文學經紀人Brett和他毫無幽默感沒有耐心的女友薩拉（Maggie Q）來家里為麗莎慶祝。尷尬的是，Brett和薩拉對”沃爾夫岡“完全沒興趣。更尷尬的是，麗莎背著杰克偷偷請來了保羅和他的只會咯咯傻笑腦子不太夠用的女友Trina。麗莎和保羅飄飄然于演出的成功。兩人公開調情，杰克氣炸了，Maggie Q被無聊到了，而Brett屢屢被激怒，Trina喝醉。杰克和麗莎對這一晚都極為不滿意，第二天兩人把各自的好友叫了回來，試圖重新過一遍當日場景，看看到底哪里出了錯?！?Night after night, the group attempts to re-create the original party. The conceit wears itself out almost instantly, since none of the characters seem particularly alive, nor is it clear why any of them are friends. Nothing important is at stake. The concept of "The Argument" doesn't kick in until the film is almost over, when Jack hires actors to come and "play" all of them in a script he has crafted based on the original night. All of the actors think this is a legitimate audition for a real project. They all take it very seriously. During the first read-through, they take on independent lives of their own, bringing eccentric interpretations to all we have just seen. This section is very clever and legitimately funny (I laughed out loud a couple of times). As the hired actors (Karan Brar, Charlotte McKinney, Nathan Stewart-Jarrett, Marielle Scott and Mark Ryder) read the script, the originals sit there and watch, arguing loudly with Jack's interpretation, or mocking Jack for his clearly biased spin. (Jack casts a hunk to play himself, for example.) This section sparks with controlled chaos. The movie goes off the rails, in the best sense. At one point, the actor playing Jack stops the scene and asks the real Jack, "I'm a little unclear. Is my character an idiot?" When Jack makes the fictional Paul declare, "What I care about most in my life are my abs and my glutes," the real Paul flips out at this mischaracterization. 【夜復一夜，這一群人不斷重復那一晚的情境。虛榮心幾乎是立刻就顯露出來，每個人都不是十分敏感，也不是很清楚為什么彼此會成為朋友。沒有什么危在旦夕，感情不會破裂。”The Argument“這個詞直到電影快要結束時才出現，杰克自己把最初那晚的情景轉化成文本，并請來幾個演員分別扮演自己和這群朋友。演員們以為這是為一個真正的項目進行的試演，都非常嚴肅地對待試讀，他們把各自的生命體驗代入，對觀眾剛才所看到的一切進行了古怪有趣的解讀。這一部分相當聰明活潑（我自己笑了幾次）。雇來的演員們讀劇本時，原型們坐在一旁觀看，同時大聲評價杰克的解讀，嘲笑他跑偏的地方，比如請了個英俊的大塊頭（Mark Ryder）演他自己。這一部分火花四射，混亂又有序。劇情逐漸脫軌（往好的方面），有一次，演員杰克問真杰克，”我有點不明白，我這個角色是個笨蛋嗎？“而當真杰克讓演員保羅聲明，”我生命中唯一關心是，是我的腹肌和臀大肌“時，真保羅勃然大怒?！?The reality in the fake play is more real than the "reality" of the movie we just saw. Or something like that. Being this high-concept, this surreal, is difficult. You have to lay the ground rules early, to get the audience on the same page, to say: "This is what we will explore here." One thinks of something like "Living in Oblivion," an extended satire and lampoon of the challenges of independent filmmaking. The whole film is an exaggeration, but it's exaggeration in service of extremely targeted points and observations. This is what is not present in "The Argument." What is also not present is perhaps the most obvious: the existential or esoteric "Rashomon"-style questions about truth. "Then why? Why are we here?" says one of the "characters" in Jack's play. It's a good question, and one "The Argument" doesn't really answer. The final sequence of "The Argument" is very funny, but it's too little too late. 【劇中劇似乎比劇更加真實可信。這種高概念和這種超現實非常難以達成。必須在早先立下基本規則，讓觀眾們與創作者達成共識，然后再告訴觀眾：”我們要研究研究這里?！坝悬c像1995年的喜劇電影《開麥拉狂想曲》（Living in Oblivion），對獨立制片電影所面臨挑戰的深度挖苦和諷刺。整部電影都在夸張，而這種夸張服務于清楚的目標和觀察對象。這在本片中沒有表現出來。另外沒有表現出來的還有存在主義的，或是類似羅生門的，關于真相的深奧問題。如同杰克的戲劇里一個演員問道，”那么為什么？為什么我們會在這里？“這是一個非常不錯的問題，本片沒有回答。電影的最后這部分非常有意思，可惜來得太晚，內容占比又太少。】 這部電影在我自己心目中是3~4分之間。 確實是有點蠢，但卻是蠢萌蠢萌的。其實我們自己和伴侶吵完架也經常在腦海里復盤，絕大多數時候是不會認識到自己的錯誤，經常性放大對方的缺點，而且不只一次會想到”這句話好為什么當時不這么說“，盡管那句話大概率傷害性極大。如果像電影里讓別人重復自己當時的言行，可能就會看出自己的愚蠢和自以為是來。比如麗莎看到賣弄風情的角色麗莎，才會意識到自己與保羅的舉止在杰克等人眼里是那樣輕浮吧。我倒是覺得麗莎和保羅之間可能真的沒什么，如果真的有事情發生過，反而會裝成若無其事的樣子。作為演員會掩飾得天衣無縫。 與上面影評里不一樣，我看這部電影時大笑了好多次，不僅僅是最后一部分演員們帶來自己的詮釋，他們自己復盤時也是差錯百出，每個人的記憶都保留對自己有利的部分。挺諷刺的。

導演Rober Schwartzman的中間名更如雷貫耳一些，是《教父》三部曲導演科波拉的外甥。這部”The Argument“中，有他之前作品《夢鄉》和《獨角獸》的海報。

墻上的海報是The Unicorn

右側是Dreamland的海報

虛構的電影作品”The Dead Doth Trod the Hills at Night“也有海報。

Maggie Q的角色看上去冷冷的酷酷的，也有很多搞笑的地方，盡管她有影像記憶（photographic memory），但因為對”沃爾夫岡“不良印象在先，心里有了成見，某些回憶就如同戴了有色眼鏡一般。對語言包括肢體語言、酒和食物等細節的精準更顯諷刺。對不相關物品的在意似乎多于對人的關心。 當尼基塔遇上Abed，居然很有喜劇效果。